A new Chatbot called ChatTJB AI has gone viral not because of its snazzy billboard in San Francisco but because of its amazing responses.

Lite and Balanced effort levels for GitHub Copilot code review are now generally available. They let you match the depth of a review to the complexity and risk of a pull request.

Not every pull request needs the same scrutiny. Documentation updates and small fixes may only need focused feedback, while complex logic, security-sensitive code, and cross-service changes benefit from deeper analysis. You can now:

• Choose Lite for feedback on straightforward changes.
• Choose Balanced when a change warrants deeper analysis from a higher-reasoning model.
• Set an organization-wide default that repositories inherit while retaining control over individual reviews.

Lite and Balanced are available with Copilot Pro, Pro+, Max, Business, and Enterprise plans.

Lite and Balanced replace Low and Medium

The Low and Medium effort levels introduced during public preview are now named Lite and Balanced. If you previously configured an effort level, your configuration automatically carries forward under the new name.

Choose an effort level for each review

When you request a Copilot code review, choose Lite for routine changes or Balanced for larger, more complex, or sensitive changes. Your choice only applies to that review and doesn’t change the repository or organization default.

⚙️ Organization-level defaults

Organization admins can set a default review effort level that applies to all repositories in the organization. Repositories that haven’t configured their own effort level inherit the organization default.

To configure the default, navigate to your organization settings → Copilot → Copilot code review.

See which effort level was used

Copilot code review now labels which effort level ran in both timeline events and the pull request overview comment. You can see at a glance whether a review ran at Balanced or Lite, making it easy to track review depth across your repositories.

📚 Find out more and share your feedback

Learn how to tune review depth for your team in the Copilot code review documentation, and share your feedback in the GitHub community.

The post Copilot code review effort levels are generally available appeared first on The GitHub Blog.

This Sticker Leaves a Real, Permanent Tattoo

CipherX, a London biotech, has put tattooing in a patch. Trained staff line up a single-use disc covered in hundreds of microneedles, press it on with a handheld applicator, and leave it fifteen minutes.

The needles are made of tattoo pigment and a biodegradable polymer. They dissolve under your skin and leave the ink behind.

The team at The Verge went up close and personal to see what the experience is like, below.

The result is a permanent tattoo. Same ink, same depth, same removal options if you change your mind.

It just arrives without the machine, the hour in the chair, or the artist’s hand.

Founder Ferdinand Kohle is a materials scientist who was building microneedles for drug delivery before he pivoted. He also wanted a tattoo at nineteen and was too scared, which is a more honest origin story than most. Around 500 have been applied so far.

The limits are real. Designs fit inside a 15mm circle, black only, chosen from a library. Hearts, stars, and, for reasons nobody has explained, Van Gogh’s chair.

Here’s what’s worth arguing about.

CipherX calls each microdot a pixel. A file becomes a pattern of ink-loaded points, then a mold, then a patch, then your arm. Everything between design and skin now happens in software and manufacturing.

Does that push the form or flatten it?

Pushing: precision no hand can hold, a real option for people with needle phobia who’ve been locked out, and a platform that could carry vaccines later. Photography didn’t kill painting.

Flattening: a tattoo has never only been the picture. It’s the choosing, the sitting, the hour of low-grade pain, the fact that a specific person put it there. Take all that out and you have an image on skin. The library of hearts and stars doesn’t help the case.

We’re not sure which one we hold. But “painless” is doing a lot of work in the pitch, and the discomfort was never the bug.

Images by CipherX and The Verge.

The post Painless Tattoos are Here. Does That Make Them More Desirable? appeared first on Moss and Fog.

Well looky, looky, it seems Mamdani's communist grocery stores are of the Jim Crow variety.